On 12/09/14 10:10, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 11/09/14 23:21, Ian Romanick wrote: >> On 09/10/2014 05:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> The original plan from Ian was to have four release candidates prior to the >>> final release. From what I can see there has been no serious amount of >>> patches >>> nominated for 10.3-rc4, so I'm planning to keep with the plan and release >>> 10.3 >>> this Friday. >>> >>> If you know of any serious issues that must land or any other reason why we >>> should delay 10.3 please let me know ASAP. >> >> I hope this is soon enough. :( >> >> Ken and I have a few bug fixes that we'd like to have land in the >> release. I think they're all out on the list for review, but Ken might >> have one more. Once they land on master, I'll send you a pull-request. >> >> Could we do one more RC tomorrow and the final release next week? We >> probably don't need to wait until Friday, but I don't have a strong opinion. >> > Hi Ian, > > What a nice timing this is. > > Just found out that I'll have to be moving to another house bit earlier than > expected, and here comes a request to delay the release by a couple of days. > > Sounds like a plan to me :) > So after some "interesting" few days, I've went through the 10.3 queue.
We have 35 newly queued patches, and when running piglit 3457f015314 against mesa 10.2.7 shows * swrast-classic 19 regressions 3 fixes 28 new tests, 28 pass * swrast-gallium (llvmpipe) 2 regressions 37 fixes 97 new tests, 91 pass, 6 fail I will give it a spin on my Sandybridge tomorrow, and barring any serious issues mesa 10.3 will be out this Friday alongside 10.2.8 :) Thanks Emil > > -Emil > >>> Thanks >>> Emil >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mesa-dev mailing list >>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >> > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
