On 19/08/14 23:26, Carl Worth wrote: > Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: >>> Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> writes: >>>> Anuj: Can you verify this does not regress proxy_textures_invalid_size? >>> ... >>>> Cc: "10.2" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> >>> >>> Ian (or Anuj), is there an outstanding question of a regression here >>> that should still be answered before this patch is picked over to the >>> stable branch? >> >> Sorry I missed this question from you and Ian. I verified that the patch >> does not regress proxy_textures_invalid_size. > > Thanks, Anuj. > > With that confirmation I've just cherry-picked this patch and pushed it > out to the 10.2 branch, (just after the 10.2.6 release). > This patch seems to regress two tests when running classic swrast. The gallium swrast is OK.
glean: fragProg1-CMP glsl1-Preprocessor test 11 (#elif) I will not have the chance to run piglit on a i965 system until next week so I would love if someone can take a look at this. Carl, As a former stable-release manager would you have any suggestions - should I pull it out from the upcoming 10.2.7 ? I would not be too fussed it only swrast regresses, yet I'm suspecting that other classic drivers could be affected. -Emil > -Carl > > > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-stable mailing list > mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
