On 07.08.2014 02:02, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > Michael, Close, but no cigar. :)
> Could you please point me at the failing tests. spec/!OpenGL 1.1/depthstencil-default_fb-drawpixels-FLOAT-and-USHORT spec/!OpenGL 1.1/draw-pixels spec/!OpenGL 1.1/stencil-drawpixels spec/!OpenGL 1.4/copy-pixels spec/ARB_depth_buffer_float/fbo-depthstencil-GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8-drawpixels-FLOAT-and-USHORT spec/ARB_depth_buffer_float/fbo-stencil-GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8-drawpixels spec/EXT_framebuffer_object/fbo-stencil-GL_STENCIL_INDEX1-drawpixels spec/EXT_framebuffer_object/fbo-stencil-GL_STENCIL_INDEX16-drawpixels spec/EXT_framebuffer_object/fbo-stencil-GL_STENCIL_INDEX14-drawpixels spec/EXT_framebuffer_object/fbo-stencil-GL_STENCIL_INDEX8-drawpixels spec/EXT_packed_depth_stencil/fbo-depthstencil-GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8-drawpixels-FLOAT-and-USHORT spec/EXT_packed_depth_stencil/fbo-stencil-GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8-drawpixels (The total number of regressions is around 20 because some of these are run for several numbers of samples) > I don't have a radeon, but I can run with llvmpipe or dri swrast and > try to find the bug that way. At least the draw-pixels test indeed regressed with llvmpipe as well. Would it be possible for you to verify that there are no piglit gpu.py regressions with llvmpipe before pushing changes like these? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
