On Saturday, July 12, 2014 03:20:10 PM Chris Forbes wrote:
> These got lost in the big brw_inst shakeup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz>
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h | 5 +++++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> index 0dadcb3..e528232 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> @@ -1295,6 +1295,11 @@ enum brw_message_target {
> (1 << 17))
> #define GEN7_DATAPORT_SCRATCH_NUM_REGS_SHIFT 12
>
> +#define GEN7_PIXEL_INTERPOLATOR_LOC_SHARED_OFFSET 0
> +#define GEN7_PIXEL_INTERPOLATOR_LOC_SAMPLE 1
> +#define GEN7_PIXEL_INTERPOLATOR_LOC_CENTROID 2
> +#define GEN7_PIXEL_INTERPOLATOR_LOC_PER_SLOT_OFFSET 3
> +
> /* HSW */
> #define HSW_DATAPORT_DC_PORT0_OWORD_BLOCK_READ 0
> #define HSW_DATAPORT_DC_PORT0_UNALIGNED_OWORD_BLOCK_READ 1
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h
> index ac00fd4..e880c9f 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h
> @@ -527,6 +527,17 @@ F(ts_opcode, MD( 0), MD( 0))
> /** @} */
>
> /**
> + * Pixel Interpolator message function control bits:
> + * @{
> + */
> +F(pi_simd_mode, MD(16), MD(16))
> +F(pi_nopersp, MD(14), MD(14))
> +F(pi_message_type, MD(13), MD(12))
> +F(pi_slot_group, MD(11), MD(11))
> +F(pi_message_data, MD(7), MD(0))
Most other messages call this msg_control (so, pi_msg_control). Any
particular reason not to do that here? I guess it's more payload data than
message control bits, but...
Whatever you want to do is fine.
> +/** @} */
> +
> +/**
> * Immediates:
> * @{
> */
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
