On 06/30/2014 10:11 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > Setting a couple of bits is the same cost or less as conditionally > setting a couple of bits. > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp > index 8f5b205..509c32c 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp > @@ -1266,12 +1266,9 @@ vec4_generator::generate_code(exec_list *instructions) > > brw_inst *last = &p->store[pre_emit_nr_insn]; > > - if (inst->conditional_mod) > - brw_inst_set_cond_modifier(brw, last, inst->conditional_mod); > - if (inst->no_dd_clear) > - brw_inst_set_no_dd_clear(brw, last, true); > - if (inst->no_dd_check) > - brw_inst_set_no_dd_check(brw, last, true); > + brw_inst_set_cond_modifier(brw, last, inst->conditional_mod); > + brw_inst_set_no_dd_clear(brw, last, inst->no_dd_clear); > + brw_inst_set_no_dd_check(brw, last, inst->no_dd_check);
The old code will only set the bits. The new code might also clear the bits, right? Is that potentially a problem? > } > } > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev