https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Baggett <baggett.patr...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > Does gcc warn about this? Are you _sure_ that (signed int)1 << 31 is illegal > in C99? And as tedious as this is to mention, C99 section 6.5.7.4 does state this is undefined behavior. I know the "C abstract machine" is far removed from real problems with drivers and whatnot -- and I appreciate the awesome work you all do on Mesa. I just wanted to clarify that there is spec support for this claim. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
