On 06/06/2014 05:13 PM, Carl Worth wrote: > Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> writes: >> Series is >> >> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com> >> Cc: "10.1 10.2" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> > > This hunk: > > + /* ARB_vertex_array_bgra */ > + case GL_COLOR_ARRAY_SIZE: > + array = &ctx->Array.VAO->VertexAttrib[VERT_ATTRIB_COLOR0]; > + v->value_int = array->Format == GL_BGRA ? GL_BGRA : array->Size; > + break; > + case GL_SECONDARY_COLOR_ARRAY_SIZE: > + array = &ctx->Array.VAO->VertexAttrib[VERT_ATTRIB_COLOR1]; > + v->value_int = array->Format == GL_BGRA ? GL_BGRA : array->Size; > + break; > + > > Doesn't compile in 10.1: > > main/get.c: In function 'find_custom_value': > main/get.c:847:26: error: 'struct gl_array_attrib' has no member named 'VAO' > array = &ctx->Array.VAO->VertexAttrib[VERT_ATTRIB_COLOR0]; > > Is that an easy backport or a patch we should drop? (I tried to scan the > patches on the other branches, but in my quick look I didn't see how to > backport this patch).
It should be easy. In commit 0dfe50f1, Ken renamed ArrayObj to VAO. Making this patch compile on 10.1 should be as easy as s/VAO/ArrayObj/g. > -Carl
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
