https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75212
--- Comment #8 from Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> --- (In reply to comment #7) > The kernel I have to use is compiled without CONFIG_DEVTMPFS and without > CONFIG_FHANDLE. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/README states that at least > these options are required, the later one explicitly for libudev, so using > libudev seems not to be an option for me :( Why not file a bug with your distribution mentioning that Mesa now requires libudev (but not udev), and asking them to enable the necessary options? CONFIG_FHANDLE appears to add no additional runtime cost, and adds a single syscall that's maybe 100 lines of code. Basically nothing. We'd really like to avoid having to maintain multiple paths. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev