https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75212

--- Comment #8 from Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The kernel I have to use is compiled without CONFIG_DEVTMPFS and without
> CONFIG_FHANDLE.
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/README states that at least
> these options are required, the later one explicitly for libudev, so using
> libudev seems not to be an option for me :(

Why not file a bug with your distribution mentioning that Mesa now requires
libudev (but not udev), and asking them to enable the necessary options? 
CONFIG_FHANDLE appears to add no additional runtime cost, and adds a single
syscall that's maybe 100 lines of code.  Basically nothing.

We'd really like to avoid having to maintain multiple paths.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to