ping for this and [PATCH 2/2] docs: Add a note about llvm-shared-libs and libxatracker
On 05/05/14 22:09, Emil Velikov wrote: > Both backends require --enable-dri, and building an empty libgbm > makes little to no sense. Error out at configure to prevent the > user from shooting themselves in the foot. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78225 > Cc: "10.1 10.2" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > --- > > Strictly speaking, not crucial for mesa-stable, although it > will be nice to have. I do not feel too strong either way. > > -Emil > > configure.ac | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index e77ed77..371c17f 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1179,6 +1179,13 @@ if test "x$enable_gbm" = xyes; then > if test "x$enable_shared_glapi" = xno; then > AC_MSG_ERROR([gbm_dri requires --enable-shared-glapi]) > fi > + else > + # Strictly speaking libgbm does not require --enable-dri, although > + # both of its backends do. Thus one can build libgbm without any > + # backends if --disable-dri is set. > + # To avoid unnecessary complexity of checking if at least one backend > + # is available when building, just mandate --enable-dri. > + AC_MSG_ERROR([gbm requires --enable-dri]) > fi > fi > AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_GBM, test "x$enable_gbm" = xyes) > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
