On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila
<juhapekka.heikk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
> index a951459..92f82fd 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
> @@ -758,6 +758,7 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
> schedule_node *last_fixed_grf_write = NULL;
> int reg_width = v->dispatch_width / 8;
>
> + schedule_node *last_accumulator_write = NULL;
> /* The last instruction always needs to still be the last
> * instruction. Either it's flow control (IF, ELSE, ENDIF, DO,
> * WHILE) and scheduling other things after it would disturb the
> @@ -822,6 +823,10 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
The line before this was
if (inst->reads_flag()) {
> add_dep(last_conditional_mod[inst->flag_subreg], n);
> }
>
> + if (inst->writes_accumulator || inst->dst.is_accumulator()) {
> + add_dep(last_accumulator_write, n);
> + }
But we're checking if we're writing the accumulator here, instead of reading it.
We're also not giving the scheduler any benefits from it's new
knowledge of accumulator dependencies, because we're still calling
add_barrier_deps() above when we don't recognize the destination. I
hope you don't mind, but I split the is_accumulator() additions into a
separate patch, fixed up the scheduler hunks and sent the revised
patch. Let me know if it looks right to you.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
