On 03/24/2014 08:06 AM, Christian König wrote:
From: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>

The original problem is fixed by now and unconditionally
destroying the sampler view, which is possible still
referenced elsewhere, is a really bad idea also.

This reverts commit 670be71bd801fea876f7512865ed5f54340da9be.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: "10.0 10.1" <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_texture.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_texture.c 
b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_texture.c
index 2826d12..eaa43d5 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_texture.c
+++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_atom_texture.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ update_single_texture(struct st_context *st,
                                stObj->base.DepthMode) ||
          (view_format != stObj->sampler_view->format) ||
          stObj->base.BaseLevel != stObj->sampler_view->u.tex.first_level) {
-        pipe_sampler_view_release(pipe, &stObj->sampler_view);
+        pipe_sampler_view_reference(&stObj->sampler_view, NULL);
        }
     }

The pipe_sampler_view_release() obeys reference counting too so I don't think this change is necessary.

-Brian


_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to