Are these comments really needed considering the format names are self-explanatory?
Marek On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz> wrote: > The comments for the actual formats were fixed a while ago, > but the examples at the top were not, which was confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz> > --- > src/mesa/main/formats.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/main/formats.h b/src/mesa/main/formats.h > index 3079f03..0ca495e 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/main/formats.h > +++ b/src/mesa/main/formats.h > @@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ typedef enum > * ** when type applies to all components > * > * examples: msb <------ TEXEL BITS -----------> lsb > - * MESA_FORMAT_A8B8G8R8_UNORM, AAAA AAAA BBBB BBBB GGGG GGGG RRRR RRRR > - * MESA_FORMAT_R5G6B5_UNORM RRRR RGGG GGGB BBBB > - * MESA_FORMAT_B4G4R4X4_UNORM BBBB GGGG RRRR XXXX > + * MESA_FORMAT_A8B8G8R8_UNORM, RRRR RRRR GGGG GGGG BBBB BBBB AAAA AAAA > + * MESA_FORMAT_R5G6B5_UNORM BBBB BGGG GGGR RRRR > + * MESA_FORMAT_B4G4R4X4_UNORM xxxx RRRR GGGG BBBB > * MESA_FORMAT_Z32_FLOAT_S8X24_UINT > * MESA_FORMAT_R10G10B10A2_UINT > * MESA_FORMAT_R9G9B9E5_FLOAT > -- > 1.9.0 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
