On Mit, 2014-03-12 at 09:49 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > The attached patches add some more checks to the instruction verifier on SI > and also fix some false positives. This should fix all the verifier errors > generated by the piglit tests.
I can confirm your patches fix the false positive errors I'm seeing with glamor. > As far as I can tell, there are no regressions with this series. I had some > trouble > making it through a full run on my Boanire system without hangs, so I would > feel better > if someone else was able to test these. No regressions in piglit gpu.py and quick_cl.py on my Kaveri. But I don't know about changes in verifier errors for those tests, and I'm not sure which indirect addressing tests you're referring to in patch 2. Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
