On 27/02/14 08:23, Marek Chalupa wrote: > Probably depending on compiler settings, the definition can be hidden, > so undefined reference error can be encountred during linking > When building with automake, the definition will be hidden if the compiler supports visibility flags. This was done with an earlier patch that adds them for the gbm target. The patch is only present in master so the stable branches are safe on that regard.
This symbol fell short when I was going through the gbm api, thanks for catching that. Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75528 > --- > src/gbm/main/gbm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/gbm/main/gbm.c b/src/gbm/main/gbm.c > index 7a4e406..b057386 100644 > --- a/src/gbm/main/gbm.c > +++ b/src/gbm/main/gbm.c > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ gbm_device_get_backend_name(struct gbm_device *gbm) > * > * \sa enum gbm_bo_format for the list of formats > */ > -int > +GBM_EXPORT int > gbm_device_is_format_supported(struct gbm_device *gbm, > uint32_t format, uint32_t usage) > { > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
