Hello list, A number of piglit tests fail with the nouveau dri driver (for pre-nv30 cards), e.g.
http://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/nv10-comparison/nv18-imirkin/spec/EGL_EXT_client_extensions/conformance%20test%203.html libEGL fatal: DRI2: did not find extension DRI_IMAGE version 1 I noticed that the nouveau driver extensions are specified as static const __DRIextension *nouveau_driver_extensions[] = { &driCoreExtension.base, &driDRI2Extension.base, &nouveau_vtable.base, NULL }; without &driImageDriverExtension.base in there (which is only used by i915/i965, although I assume st/dri implements it in its own way), which is most likely the cause of that failure. I looked at the functions pointed at by the structure, and they all seem to be available with the nouveau driver (but there could be something subtle I'm missing). So... should I just drop in &driImageDriverExtension.base into the list? What is it for? Is there a downside to including it? As a side-note, what _does_ appear to be missing is Allocate/ReleaseBuffer, seemingly needed by the DRI2 stuff. Perhaps some of the failures are due to that :) Thanks, -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
