On 2014-01-07 23:05, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 01/07/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
This small rearrangement avoids MSVC 2013 ICE. Also, this should be a better
memory access order.
Can you explain this better? As far as I can tell, this just changes
the order the indices are visited (and has a spurious, incorrect
whitespace change). This shouldn't affect the correctness of the code
at all.
No, the error is in the MSVC 2013 c++ compiler which dies with an
internal compiler error (ICE). It is not intended to affect the
correctness of the code. I will also report the ICE to microsoft.
Regards,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
