On 12/12/2013 02:42 AM, Pi Tabred wrote:
On 12.12.2013 01:39, Brian Paul wrote:
On 12/11/2013 02:55 PM, Pi Tabred wrote:
- add xml file for extension
- add reference in gl_API.xml
- add pointer to device driver function table
- add new functions to list of available functions
Or "- update dispatch_sanity.cpp"
---
src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_clear_buffer_object.xml | 50
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/mapi/glapi/gen/gl_API.xml | 6 +++-
src/mesa/main/dd.h | 5 +++
src/mesa/main/tests/dispatch_sanity.cpp | 4 +--
4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_clear_buffer_object.xml
diff --git a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_clear_buffer_object.xml
b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_clear_buffer_object.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e7baf6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_clear_buffer_object.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<!DOCTYPE OpenGLAPI SYSTEM "gl_API.dtd">
+
+<!-- Note: no GLX protocol info yet. -->
+
+
+<OpenGLAPI>
+
+<category name="GL_ARB_clear_buffer_object" number="121">
+
+ <function name ="ClearBufferData" offset="assign">
+ <param name="target" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="internalformat" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="format" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="type" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="data" type="const GLvoid *"/>
+ </function>
+
+ <function name ="ClearBufferSubData" offset="assign">
+ <param name="target" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="internalformat" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="offset" type="GLintptr"/>
+ <param name="size" type="GLsizeiptr"/>
+ <param name="format" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="type" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="data" type="const GLvoid *"/>
+ </function>
+
+<!-- <function name="ClearNamedBufferDataEXT" offset="assign"
es2="3.0">
+ <param name="buffer" type="GLuint"/>
+ <param name="internalformat" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="format" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="type" type="GLenum"/>
+ <param name="data" type="const GLvoid*"/>
Space before '*' just to be consistent (and below).
the second two functions are mentioned in the spec but depend on
EXT_direct_state_access (which is not available in mesa yet).
That's why I included them here but commented them out. Is that ok? or
should I remove them?
Off-hand, I'm not sure. There are other extensions with the same issue.
Maybe take a look at another .xml file and see what's done.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
