On 10/18/2013 11:31 AM, Alexandre Demers wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking at the latest commits and some comments here and there. Is > it me or is docs/GL3.txt not up to date?
I don't know of you're up to date or not, but GL3.txt almost surely is not. > For example, on Sept 24th ( > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/PjyyP3KOnlzH11QKVtyC), Marek was > confirming GL_ARB_texture_multisample support for r600 and si (CIK > missing). Thus, it should be listed as implemented for r600. And from my > understanding, it was completed for the 9.2 release, so GL3.txt should > have been updated before that. > > Intel pushed its latest patches to complete the 3.2 and 3.3 features in > the last couple of days, but the GL3.txt was not updated at the same > time. GLSL 1.50 and 3.30 should be listed as DONE for at least Intel. > > What I'm saying is I most of the time learn going through commits or > Phoronix that a new feature is now considered done than from GL3.txt. > GL3.txt should be updated at the same time as features are considered > completed by a dev if it is truly complete. When a feature is completed, both GL3.txt and the release notes should be updated. It's /really/ easy to over look both of those, however. > I know, I can find it by other means, but why not just make sure we are > updating the doc at the right moment? > > My two cents as a tester... > > -- > Alexandre Demers > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
