On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/10/13 19:59, Matt Turner wrote: >> I think now that xf86drm.h's include is protected by __NOT_HAVE_DRM_H >> we can now just drop HAVE_COMMON_DRI entirely. Right? >> > Sounds like a plan, with a minor side effect that you'll be building the > code when you do not need it - osmesa, and any non-dri gallium targets.
Would we? src/mesa/drivers/dri/common is only built via src/mesa/drivers/dri, which is only built if HAVE_DRI. I think we're safe. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
