On 10/09/2013 06:01 PM, jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
From: José Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com>Unless the polygon fill mode is different PIPE_POLYGON_MODE_FILL, so checking the the polygon mode is sufficient. Testing done: no regression in polygon-mode-offset --- src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_rasterizer.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_rasterizer.c b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_rasterizer.c index 6148337..2149ffc 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_rasterizer.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_rasterizer.c @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ llvmpipe_create_rasterizer_state(struct pipe_context *pipe, */ need_pipeline = (rast->fill_front != PIPE_POLYGON_MODE_FILL || rast->fill_back != PIPE_POLYGON_MODE_FILL || - rast->offset_point || - rast->offset_line || rast->point_smooth || rast->line_smooth || rast->line_stipple_enable ||
I don't remember all the circumstances of when I made that change originally, but if it seems to fix things, great.
Tag for 9.2 branch? Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
