On 08/26/2013 07:10 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 27/08/13 00:51, Brian Paul wrote:
On 08/26/2013 04:43 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
---
src/mesa/main/hash.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/mesa/main/hash.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/hash.c b/src/mesa/main/hash.c
index 6591af9..8dde8b1 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/hash.c
+++ b/src/mesa/main/hash.c
@@ -302,6 +302,32 @@ _mesa_HashDeleteAll(struct _mesa_HashTable *table,
/**
+ * Clone all entries in a hash table, into a new table.
+ *
+ * \param table the hash table to clone
+ */
+struct _mesa_HashTable *
+_mesa_HashClone(struct _mesa_HashTable *table)
Can that be const qualified?
The cloned tables are to be edited after we clone them. Basically we
just want a copy of whats on the top of the stack when we do a push but
then the we want to be able to be able to add more ids to this copy if
we want to. I have a piglit test for push/popDebugGroup that shows what
I mean.
I will try to polish this up and submit it later today.
Or I'm I miss understanding what you are suggesting?
I'm simply asking if the 'table' function parameter can be
const-qualified. Normally, when you clone an object you don't modify
the original object, so I'd assume that it could be const.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
