Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> writes: > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn schrieb: >>> How about disabling AltiVec code generation by adding "-mno-altivec" to >>> CXXFLAGS? AFAICT what's going on is that the "-maltivec" option (which >>> is implied by your "-mcpu=7450") enables a number of language >>> extensions as a side effect that collide with the C++ standard, which >>> is exacerbated by GCC's seemingly broken implementation. > > Ah, and one potential issue I didn't think of yet is that -mno-altivec also > implies -mabi=no-altivec and I am unsure if this can lead to problems if > altivec ABI is enabled for the rest of the build. > Aren't both options orthogonal? It seems like you can enable the AltiVec ABI without getting the annoying language extensions by doing "-mno-altivec -mabi=altivec".
> > Best regards, > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
pgpShpfDnoGvp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
