That looks wrong to me as well. What would make get_indirect_index different in 
this case?

----- Original Message -----
> From: Fabian Bieler <fabianbie...@fastmail.fm>
> 
> ---
>  src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
> b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
> index c199385..1d27e81 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,9 @@ emit_fetch_gs_input(
>                                            reg->Register.File,
>                                            reg->Register.Index,
>                                            &reg->Indirect);
> +
> +      LLVMValueRef ind = lp_build_const_int32(gallivm, 0);
> +      attrib_index = LLVMBuildExtractElement(builder, attrib_index, ind,
> "");
>     } else {
>        attrib_index = lp_build_const_int32(gallivm, reg->Register.Index);
>     }
> --
> 1.8.3.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to