On 07/10/2013 01:24 AM, Topi Pohjolainen wrote:
v2:
    - refactor both occurences, not just one

Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
---
  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c 
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
index ce7a51e..e3ce505 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
@@ -231,6 +231,21 @@ static struct intel_image_format intel_image_formats[] = {
         { 0, 1, 0, __DRI_IMAGE_FORMAT_ARGB8888, 4 } } }
  };

+static struct intel_image_format *
+intel_image_format_lookup(int fourcc)
+{
+   struct intel_image_format *f = 0;

The code convention throughout Mesa is to use NULL rather 0 for null pointers.
With that small fix, this patch is
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.vers...@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to