Will Schmidt <will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 14:50 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> > > The entirety of the comment looks pretty good to me. :-) One > question, and this is mostly curiosity on my part, I'm not specifically > asking for another revision. > >> * (This is the same as C bitfield layout on most ABIs.) > > Do we have a handle on what 'most ABIs' are? I.e. would this include > X86* and PPC* ABIs as we know them today, or do we already clearly > understand which ones would not match?
I think it includes all ABIs supported by GCC, including the various x86 and ppc ones like you say. I should probably have dropped the bitfield thing altogether though. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
