On 05/28/2013 12:31 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:-// { "glValidateProgramPipeline", 43, -1 }, // XXX: Add to xml -// { "glGetProgramPipelineInfoLog", 43, -1 }, // XXX: Add to xml + { "glValidateProgramPipeline", 43, -1 }, + { "glGetProgramPipelineInfoLog", 43, -1 },Could you explain to me why these are 43s (rather than 41) again? I thought (and from looking at the rest of the file, this seems to be the case) that they were the minimum context version that guarantees the functions' availability, either by GL spec requirements of or "every driver that supports X.Y has this function). I filed bug 62612 to get this sorted but there was some misunderstanding somewhere.
I honestly have no idea. I objected to this whole mechanism for separating functions by version when Jordan first proposed it. What I wanted (and what would have been understandable!) is for there to be a separate table for each version that contains the functions that Mesa can support starting with that version. This is the way the ES2 vs ES3 is handled. The current setup is just lies... there are quite a few OpenGL 3.0 functions that Mesa can support in OpenGL 1.4 contexts (via extensions).
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
