Christoph Brill <egore...@egore911.de> writes: > Hi list, > > I'm trying to follow the patches and patchsets sent to mesa-dev and > really like the process of how they get reviewed. It's a good way of > catching bugs before they get committed. But currently this approach > has a downside (at least for me): It's easy to miss a patch and > happens from time to time to others as well (see > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-May/039178.html ) > > Has anyone thought about using Gerrit for code reviews (like done for > Libreoffice at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/ )? I like the way it > integrates with git and might be a good idea to use for mesa-dev (and > maybe even dri-devel) as well.
Yeah, we've thought about it, and even asked fdo admins to install a jenkins setup for continuous integration as a prelude to possibly putting in gerrit to get testing along with the review process. The major downside to gerritt that I see is the loss of offline reviewing of patches, which is how I do basically all my patch review.
pgpiSPOlBs6Yo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
