2013/3/16 Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Andreas Boll > <andreas.boll....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Taken from downstream: >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-xorg/lib/mesa.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/10-hurd-configure-tweaks.diff;h=984e17df1b8afdf8e4b36bee96aa5ab6a5691021;hb=refs/heads/ubuntu%2B1 >> >> Thanks to Pino Toscano. >> >> NOTE: This is a candidate for stable branches. >> --- >> configure.ac | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index 4b5b045..d0ccf5e 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ if test "x$enable_asm" = xyes; then >> case "$host_cpu" in >> i?86) >> case "$host_os" in >> - linux* | *freebsd* | dragonfly* | *netbsd*) >> + linux* | *freebsd* | dragonfly* | *netbsd* | gnu*) >> test "x$enable_64bit" = xyes && asm_arch=x86_64 || asm_arch=x86 >> ;; >> esac >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 > > But don't bother with x86_64?
AFAICT hurd doesn't support x86_64 so far [1]. I think the attached patch makes more sense. [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/gnumach/hardware_compatibility_list.html
hurd-patch-v2.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
