On Die, 2013-03-05 at 14:43 -0500, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote: > On 03/05/2013 01:58 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kevin H. Hobbs <hob...@ohio.edu> wrote: > >> > >> so now configure is giving me exactly what I asked for which is good :-) > >> > >> Unfortunately it isn't what I want :-( and the swrast driver gives me > >> more vtk test errors than the llvmpipe driver :-( > > > > It's what you asked for but not what you wanted? Not sure I can help > > with that. :) > > > > If whatever this problem is is caused by the commit you mention, I > > have a patch on the list now to fix it. > > > > > > > The only software renderer in the output of './configure --help' is swrast. > > I asked for a software renderer, and I got one, so I didn't notice that > I didn't get what I was asking for. > > I also didn't know the difference between software renderers > OSMesa=Xlib=Swrast=llvmpipe... > > Now, I realize that I was asking for a specific software renderer, and > got a different one. > > The patch discussed in this thread fixed that.
Actually, you asked for two different software renderers: --with-dri-drivers=swrast produces lib/swrast_dri.so based on classic swrast, --with-gallium-drivers=swrast produces lib/gallium/swrast_dri.so based on llvmpipe/softpipe. Presumably both are built before and after the change(s) in question, they merely changed which one ends up installed / picked up first at runtime. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
