https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61764
--- Comment #3 from Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'd still argue that this is a bug. If the extensions were removed, their > implementation should be fully removed (as in, these functions, especially > the EXT/ARB versions of them should be removed), instead of leaving some > sort of a buggy shell, which can still be called (or at least can be tried > to be called). So I'd just fully remove these, so there'd be no confusion. No this is not correct. The problem is there never was a separate ARB_imaging extension, this is (rather was) part of core but optionally supported. As such there's language in the spec which says you have to return invalid_enum for invalid operands and invalid_operation for unsupported functions belonging to this imaging subset. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
