On 04.02.2013 08:27, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fre, 2013-02-01 at 22:50 +0100, Christoph Bumiller wrote: >> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.c >> b/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.c >> index d0f0070..7ae9dd6 100644 >> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.c >> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.c >> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static int r300_get_param(struct pipe_screen* pscreen, >> enum pipe_cap param) >> case PIPE_CAP_TEXTURE_MULTISAMPLE: >> case PIPE_CAP_CUBE_MAP_ARRAY: >> case PIPE_CAP_TEXTURE_BUFFER_OBJECTS: >> + case PIPE_CAP_DRAW_INDIRECT: >> return 0; >> >> /* SWTCL-only features. */ > Thanks for adding the cap to r300g, but what about r600g and radeonsi? >
For r300, nv30 and nv50 it was clear that it's not going to be supported. For sp and lp I just used the helper function because there's probably no better way to do it there. For r600 and radeonsi I thought you'd set the cap together with a patch that implements the feature, there's probably plenty of time until this has gone through review :) (Can't tell if it's easy to do or not since I can't find EG+ docs, but on nvc0 it was rather simple.) But if no one feels like doing that until indirect drawing can be merged, I'll add the return 0's for you as well. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
