https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #9 from Johannes Obermayr <johannesoberm...@gmx.de> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Johannes, I totally fail to see how your rant explains this problem at all. Michel, thanks to making me thinking on this issue a second time. First I thought it was an error because llvm-config was not found ... But it does not matter for question whether it is Mesa's problem: We can either make configure to find libs with an own compile/link function and shoot possibility to try whether it is a shared lib because "$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS $LLVM_LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext -l$LIB" succeeds on shared and static libs and we do not know which and where $LIB was found (LLVM_LDFLAGS or compiler's default search path) to try whether it is shared or we let current implementation and fail if it doesn't work on stupid systems and preserve runtime functionality. Because I want to preserve runtime functionality I am voting for: RESOLVED / NOTOURBUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
