On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
> The ETC1 changes failed at this, so let's make sure it will be caught in
> testing next time.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c
> index 2f1b354..3f21601 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_validate.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ intel_finalize_mipmap_tree(struct intel_context *intel,
> GLuint unit)
> if (intelObj->mt != intelImage->mt) {
> intel_miptree_copy_teximage(intel, intelImage, intelObj->mt);
> }
> +
> + /* After we're done, we'd better agree that our layout is
> + * appropriate, or we'll end up hitting this function again on the
> + * next draw
> + */
> + assert(intel_miptree_match_image(intelObj->mt,
> &intelImage->base.Base));
Should we use _mesa_error here, or is it very unlikely another
scenario will lead here?
Series Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
