On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:26 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 12/05/2012 07:32 AM, Brian Paul wrote: > > On 12/04/2012 04:55 PM, Jordan Justen wrote: > >> +/** > >> + * This function is an iterator over the hash table. > >> + * > >> + * Pass in NULL for the first entry, as in the start of a for loop. > >> Note that > >> + * an iteration over the table is O(table_size) not O(entries). > >> + */ > >> +struct set_entry * > >> +_mesa_set_next_entry(struct set *ht, struct set_entry *entry) > > > > Should ht be const-qualified here too? > > Since the returned set_entry isn't const-qualified, probably not. I > think the compiler will generate an error.
I added const to ht, and it is still building for me. (GCC 4.7) I plan to push this series with Brian's feedback. Or, do you suspect different compilers might take issue with it? -Jordan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
