Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> writes: > I'm pretty tempted by ralloc_rewrite_tail & ralloc_strn_rewrite_tail.
I still don't like the lack of symmetry here. Maybe bite the bullet and
make the first one ralloc_str_rewrite_tail?
But that "rewrite_tail" keeps feeling so awkward. I think the real
problem is that it's using two words for a single concept, (there's
nothing with "rewrite_head", for example). How about just using
"rewrite" everywhere for this concept?
That would give us the following parallels:
ralloc_strcat -> ralloc_str_rewrite
ralloc_strncat -> ralloc_strn_rewrite
ralloc_asprintf -> ralloc_asprintf_rewrite
I think I could be happy with that. What do you think?
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgpHD6qbpXKe4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
