I cherry-picked the last three. The commit with conflicts cannot be cherry-picked because it depends on some other non-trivial changes in r600g. It would have to be rewritten from scratch. Given the schedule, I don't think it's worth the effort.
Marek On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > Marek, > > There are a handful of r600g patches on master that are marked as candidates > for the stable branches. The first in the series (933faae) doesn't apply > cleanly to 9.0, and I assume it won't apply cleanly to 8.0 either. Could > you pick these over? > > 933faae2b8669f459e7ab27d6bcbfb6f4136b6d5 r600g: flush FMASK and CMASK when > changing colorbuffers on Evergreen > 836325bf7edd797e02ab0717a05ca5c51aa1ac93 r600g: fix instance divisor on > Cayman > fd5c5384648a0d6191c19748a2d1f1148c5ee98f r600g: fix RSQ of negative value on > Cayman > 96f50d0cf7bb13507f272d2f6ef9a6fca24d18e1 r600g: fix EXP on Cayman _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
