On 09/24/2012 11:09 PM, John Kåre Alsaker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com
<mailto:bri...@vmware.com>> wrote:
On 09/23/2012 05:44 AM, John Kåre Alsaker wrote:
---
src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_texture.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_texture.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_texture.c
index 9830e79..97ec7ee 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_texture.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/svga/svga_resource_texture.c
@@ -540,14 +540,6 @@ svga_texture_from_handle(struct
pipe_screen *screen,
pipe_reference_init(&tex->b.b.reference, 1);
tex->b.b.screen = screen;
- if (format == SVGA3D_X8R8G8B8)
- tex->b.b.format = PIPE_FORMAT_B8G8R8X8_UNORM;
- else if (format == SVGA3D_A8R8G8B8)
- tex->b.b.format = PIPE_FORMAT_B8G8R8A8_UNORM;
- else {
- /* ?? */
- }
-
SVGA_DBG(DEBUG_DMA, "wrap surface sid %p\n", srf);
tex->key.cachable = 0;
Yeah, I don't know what that's all about either. Have you done a
piglit run with this change to check for regressions?
Piglit doesn't pass the sanity tests with Mesa master. Are there any
tests for shared handles in there?
There's only two tests in sanity.tests (glean/readPixSanity and
glean/basic) and they both pass for me with the VMware svga driver.
What exactly is your command line and what's the output?
In any case, the sanity.tests group isn't enough. A full piglit run
would be run with something like this:
./piglit_run.py tests.all.tests results
I'll run the test here but you might want to do more investigation on
your side to see why the sanity tests aren't passing.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
