On Sam, 2012-09-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > > On Fre, 2012-09-14 at 08:21 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Andreas Boll > >> > > >> > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/andreas/mesa-testing/lib" LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > >> > LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe glxinfo | egrep > >> > "OpenGL|rendering" > >> > > >> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying > >> > /home/andreas/mesa-testing/lib/dri/tls/swrast_dri.so > >> > libGL: OpenDriver: trying > >> > /home/andreas/mesa-testing/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so > >> > libGL error: dlopen /home/andreas/mesa-testing/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so > >> > failed (/home/andreas/mesa-testing/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: undefined > >> > symbol: driSWRastExtension) > >> > libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so > >> > libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast > >> > > >> > direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting > >> > LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose) > >> > OpenGL vendor string: X.Org > >> > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RV770 > >> > OpenGL version string: 1.4 (2.1 Mesa 8.0.4) > >> > OpenGL extensions: > >> > >> Thanks so much for testing! Testing is the hardest part in all of > >> this. > > > > While that's probably true in general, it certainly isn't hard for the > > targets using software rendering, as Andreas' example above shows. > > You know I actually haven't announced this branch on the mailing list, right?
I didn't (mean to) claim or suggest otherwise, and I'm not sure what that has to do with how hard it is to test the Gallium software rendering targets? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
