On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > On 08/30/2012 02:33 PM, Brian Paul wrote: >> >> On 08/30/2012 08:08 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: >>> >>> It occurs to me that, even though the i965 driver can support OpenGL >>> 3.1 on some hardware, glxinfo will only (ever) say 3.0. We don't >>> support GL_ARB_compatibility, >> >> >> What features of GL_ARB_compatibility are you missing? Do you plan on >> supporting GL_ARB_compatibility someday? > > > No. There are several 3.1 features that interact poorly with some > compatibility features (especially TexBOs and some legacy texture formats). > We'd have to jump through hoops to make some of these features at all, and > I'd much rather have the time spent optimizing the features we do support, > finishing OpenGL ES 3.0, and working on OpenGL 3.2 >
I'm just wondering have you actually done a survey of apps that may or may not require ARB_compatibility? Since both major vendor drivers provide this, are you locking mesa out of some known use cases? Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
