On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 15:50 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > On 08/31/2012 02:53 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Vadim Girlin<vadimgir...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> From ARB_sync spec: > >> > >> If the value of<timeout> is zero, then ClientWaitSync does not > >> block, but simply tests the current state of<sync>. TIMEOUT_EXPIRED > >> will be returned in this case if<sync> is not signaled, even though > >> no actual wait was performed. > >> > >> Fixes random fails of the arb_sync-timeout-zero piglit test on r600g. > > > > We had similar failures. Thanks! > > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt<e...@anholt.net> > > Candidate for the 9.0 (and 8.0?) branches?
Probably yes, but I forget to mention it in the commit message. On the other hand, I think it doesn't fix anything besides that test. Vadim > > -Brian > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
