On 08/19/2012 11:40 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 08/17/2012 08:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
---
src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml | 11 -----------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml
index 53d9aa9..606e546 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml
+++ b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml
@@ -680,17 +680,6 @@
<return type="void"/>
<param name="mask" type="GLbitfield"/>
</proto>
-
- <desc name="mask" error="GL_INVALID_VALUE">
- <value name="0"/>
- <value name="(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value name="(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value name="(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value name="(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT|GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value name="(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT|GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value name="(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT|GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
- <value
name="(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT|GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT|GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT)"/>
Way to go, enumerating every possible combination...now that is quality
code :)
- </desc>
</template>
<template name="ClearColor">
It looks like this code prevents GL_ACCUM_BUFFER_BIT from being used.
Admittedly, seeing as that isn't defined in any GLES headers, it's
probably OK, but I suppose it isn't *entirely* useless.
Good catch! That is a legit bug. GL_ACCUM_BUFFER_BIT isn't accepted in
ES or core contexts. I'll move this to the "other" group of patches,
and I'll add the missing checks.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
