----- Original Message ----- > On 1 August 2012 12:10, Benoit Jacob < bja...@mozilla.com > wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > On 08/01/2012 11:23 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > We're now at the finish line of passing WebGL 1.0.1 test on > > > > real > > > > > drivers. > > > > > > > > > > We landed a work-around for the glLinkProgram issue, as it was > > > > > happening on many drivers across many OSes. > > > > > > > > > > Now the very last conformance failure on the Intel driver / > > > > Mesa > > > > > 8.0.2 is the one in this test page, > > > > > > > > > > https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/conformance-suites/1.0.1/conformance/context/context-attributes-alpha-depth-stencil-antialias.html > > > > > > > > > > Which is caused by the Intel driver lying about GL_MAX_SAMPLES, > > > > as > > > > > explained by Eric in the "WebGL WG interested in 1.0.1 > > > > conformance > > > > > test results on real drivers" thread on this list: > > > > > > > > That test passes with Mesa master. Paul Berry implemented MSAA > > > > support. > > > Wonderful! > > > What version check should I perform? Version x.y.z >= 8.1.0 ? > > Yes. For Intel drivers, GL_MAX_SAMPLES will be trustworthy in version > 8.1.0 and beyond. Many thanks, that's what I needed to know. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779580 > Disclaimer: I don't know if any of the other back-ends followed our > lead and lied about GL_MAX_SAMPLES--I hope not. But someone more > knowledgeable about Radeon/Nouveau/LLVMPipe might want to chime in > about that :) I am definitely interested in the status of other drivers as well. Benoit > > Benoit > > > > > > > > --Ken > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mesa-dev mailing list > > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
