On 06/20/2012 04:18 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On 06/19/2012 11:34 PM, Vinson Lee wrote:
The GLX headers on Solaris are not recent enough.
Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee<v...@freedesktop.org>
---
src/SConscript | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/SConscript b/src/SConscript
index 75c4446..f55a20e 100644
--- a/src/SConscript
+++ b/src/SConscript
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ SConscript('mesa/SConscript')
SConscript('mapi/vgapi/SConscript')
if not env['embedded']:
- if env['platform'] not in ('cygwin', 'darwin', 'freebsd',
'haiku', 'windows'):
+ if env['platform'] not in ('cygwin', 'darwin', 'freebsd',
'haiku', 'sunos', 'windows'):
SConscript('glx/SConscript')
if env['platform'] not in ['darwin', 'haiku', 'sunos']:
SConscript('egl/main/SConscript')
It doesn't sound very useful to build Mesa on Solaris without GLX
support. I guess you could use EGL, but...most existing apps use
GLX,
so I imagine not much would run...
That said, I don't use Solaris nor SCons, so it's not really my place
to
say...
I agree. I don't know what's the end goal of Solaris support, but I can't see
much use to build on Solaris without GLX.
Mesa already ships some glx headers, so maybe a better solution would be to
ensure that they are included before system headers on scons.
There's two GLX implementations: the "real" one in src/glx/ and the
"fake" one built on Xlib in src/gallium/state_trackers/glx/xlib/ (or
src/mesa/drivers/xlib).
If you're only going to use software drivers, the fake glx is sufficient.
Vinson, I think we're curious what the goal is for Solaris support.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
