+1 always in favor of getting more people into the review pipeline On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alyssa Rosenzweig < alyssa.rosenzw...@collabora.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Icecream95[1], a long-time Mesa/Panfrost contributor, has requested > developer access to mesa on the GitLab issue tracker [2]. Quoting here > for convenience of those who monitor the mailing list but not the > tracker: > > > @alyssa keeps complaining about getting poked to assign stuff to Marge > > for me, so I think it's finally time to ask for Mesa developer access, > > so I can do the endless retries until CI stops flaking myself. > > > > Assuming a platform with char as unsigned, I think my 210 patches in > > Mesa is more than the 32 commits some have suggested to be required > > for the lofty privilege of labelling MRs and bothering the merge bot. > > All else being equal, with my Panfrost maintainer hat, I am in favour. > Marge Bot access would reduce merge friction for their frequent > contributions, given the substantial timezone difference with our team > at Collabora. Additionally, labeling access would ease triage for us; > although I subscribe specifically to Panfrost MRs, I have to monitor all > MRs to ensure I haven't missed any from them, a frequent occurrence. > > [ The cynic reads: This is more for my benefit than theirs ;-) ] > > Thanks, > > Alyssa > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/icecream95 > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/4135 > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
