AFAIK, anisitropic filtering is almost uselessly underspecified, so pretty much anything should pass the CTS tests.
But visual quality does affect applications, so we should probably aim for something reasonable. On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 19:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 18:49, Andreas Fänger <a.faen...@e-sign.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > > > don’t know why the current softpipe/swrast implementation shouldn’t > > be conformant. > > Interesting I hadn't known we had a correct impl in mesa, the > features.txt has said > "softpipe and llvmpipe advertise 16x anisotropy but simply ignore the > setting" > > so I never dug any deeper. I'll consider a port of this to llvmpipe > at > some point, making it efficient might be tricky. > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
