________________________________ From: Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 15:56 To: Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com>; Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> Cc: Neha Bhende <bhen...@vmware.com>; Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsb...@gmail.com>; Dylan Baker <baker.dyla...@gmail.com>; mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Drop scons for 20.1?
On 2020-03-27 2:29 p.m., Jose Fonseca wrote: > > If SCons is such a time sink, then the best we can do is suggest to > take it off Marge-bot. That would be something like https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fmesa%2Fmesa%2F-%2Fmerge_requests%2F4352&data=02%7C01%7Cjfonseca%40vmware.com%7C786cd1eeae684a45dd3a08d7d26766aa%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637209213877300351&sdata=c9OoEsfgpIGhwoewerL%2Fb7ZShTr9CVCtLJdcMPLoUVk%3D&reserved=0 then. Not quite what I had in mind (I suggested take it off Marge-bot, as opposed to take it off completely.) But lets continue the conversion in the MR. For the record I also did make a https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4348 for reducing the targets as suggested by Marek, which I'd like to get in first. > The onus of fixing SCons will go back to us, as it always did > throughout these the past twelve years. Not for the last year or so, when it's been part of the pre-merge CI pipeline? True. And while I don't recall asking SCons to be added to pre-merge CI (I certainly did not), I do appreciate the effort and grief this might have caused. Lets take it out. As tiring fixing SCons by ourselves might be, is still better than being constantly painted as the bad guys and constantly have to fend off requests to yank off SCons. Jose
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
