On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:46 PM Bas Nieuwenhuizen <b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:49 AM Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > > > > > > I just merged > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/2794 , which > > affects people who want to run the CI pipeline on personal Mesa branches: > > > > Pushing changes to a personal branch now always creates a pipeline, but > > none of the jobs in it run by default. (There are no longer any special > > branch names affecting this, because creating MRs from such special > > branches resulted in duplicate CI job runs) > > > > The container stage jobs can be triggered manually from the GitLab UI > > (and maybe also via the GitLab API, for people who'd like to automate > > this? I haven't looked into that). The build/test stage jobs run > > automatically once all their dependencies have passed. > > > > As an example, in order to run one of the "piglit-*" test jobs, one has > > to manually trigger the "x86_build" and "x86_test" jobs. > > > > The pipelines created for merge requests still run all jobs by default > > as before. > > > > > > The main motivation for these changes is to avoid wasting CI runner > > resources. In that same spirit, please also cancel any unneeded > > build/test jobs. This can be done already before those jobs start > > running, e.g. while the container stage jobs run. > > No complaint about not running the pipelines by default in personal > repositories, but expecting people to cancel automatically spawned CI > jobs as normal part of their workflow seems incredibly fiddly and > fragile to me. Are we *that* constrained? >
It would be nice if there was some way to setup some conservative filters to exclude groups of tests, ie. if only paths changed were under src/freedreno or src/gallium/drivers/freedreno, then no need to run panfrost CI, and visa versa. We probably shouldn't try to fine tune that *too* much at this risk of skipping tests that should have run, but seems like there should be same safe low hanging fruit to cut down on CI runs in common cases. I guess maybe that only helps if the bottleneck are the hw CI runners, which might not be the case.. I'm not sure. BR, -R _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
