On Fri., Oct. 11, 2019, 02:02 Dave Airlie, <airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 14:56, Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:46 PM Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> > wrote: > > > > > > On October 10, 2019 15:15:29 Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I expect to make a new libdrm release soon. Any objections to > changing the versioning scheme? > > >> > > >> Current: 2.4.n > > >> n = starts from 0, incremented per release > > >> > > >> New proposals: > > >> year.n.0 (19.0.0) > > > > > > > > > > > > Following the Mesa convention seems reasonable. > > > > > > > can't we get to 2.4.999? > > > > j/k, I also agree that following mesa convention seems reasonable > > > > BR, > > -R > > Are we talking package version and library version or just package? > > Changing the library version major would be a larger undertaking, we > probably should have been changing the minor for ages. > I don't understand. I mean changing the release version in configure.ac and meson.build. Marek > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
