On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:05 AM apinheiro <apinhe...@igalia.com> wrote:
> (Thanks Chema for pointing me this thread) > > On 21/8/19 9:09, Emil wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > > > On 21 August 2019 01:22:00 EEST, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> > wrote: > >> Sorry for the late breaking hold but I just realized that > >> GL_ARB_gl_spirv > >> and OpenGL 4.6 for Intel is 1 regression (I think it's not even a > >> regression) away from landing. Can I have 24 hours? > >> > > As you have noticed I've rolled our RC1 just after your email went out. > > > > From a quick look we are talking about 20 or so patches. I'm fine with > cherry-picking the work for RC2 if we get a couple of +1 from other > developers. > > > > We had the odd exception in the past, I see no reason why we cannot do > one here - GL4.6 is a worthy addition :-) > > > I have just added some comments on the gitlab, among other things > clarifying the "I think it's not even a regression" thing. In my > opinion, both extension have been tested long using CTS and piglit, and > it is time to get some real world testing (even if the piglit branch is > under review). So as soon as Jason and Caio agrees with push those 3 > patches to mesa master, +1 from me to include it on the release > (although I guess that I'm a subjective opinion). > This has now landed in master, and I'd like to see it in -rc2 as well. I guess someone's going to have to write a relnotes patch. --Jason
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
