On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:10, <mathias.froehl...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> From: Mathias Fröhlich <mathias.froehl...@gmx.net>
>
> Do not offer a hardware drm backed egl device if no render node
> is available.
As far as I can see current implementation does _not_ add the DRM
device if its missing render node (and a primary one).
Looking at the change below, it's effectively making the primary node optional.

Hence the comment does not alight with the code - old and new. Can you
elaborate?

I have not thought exactly how primary node-less DRM will work out
esp. since the EGL_EXT_device_drm extension explicitly mentions one.

-Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to